Get Informed

Regular updates, analysis and context straight to your email

In Mississippi, a Lost Second Chance for Gerome Moore

“You look like a cold-blooded monster.”

In Mississippi, a Lost Second Chance for Gerome Moore

“You look like a cold-blooded monster.”


That’s what officers told then 17-year-old Gerome Moore when they interrogated him following the 2015 shooting of Carolyn Temple. Moore ultimately confessed to driving the getaway car for two friends who robbed and shot Temple in her boyfriend’s driveway; she died a week later from the gunshot wound. The teen also confessed to bringing the gun used to kill Temple, though he did not use it himself. In the fall of 2016, a jury found Moore guilty of capital murder, a conviction that carried a mandatory sentence of life without parole.

Because Moore was a juvenile at the time of the shooting, he was eligible for resentencing under Montgomery v. Louisiana and Miller v. Alabama. In Miller, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 2012 that sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juveniles. Montgomery, decided the year that Moore was found guilty, ruled that Miller must be applied retroactively. The ruling gave kids sentenced to life without parole, like Moore, a chance to petition for a more lenient sentence. But earlier this year, Hinds County Circuit Judge Jeff Weill ruled against Moore’s motion, denying him a chance for resentencing and affirming the ruling that he should die in prison — even though he didn’t pull the trigger.

Together, the two Supreme Court rulings require states to give kids sentenced to life without parole a “meaningful opportunity for release,” and Miller dictates that only kids whose cases demonstrate “irreparable corruption” should result in a life without parole sentence. Prosecutors across the country were required to reassess hundreds of sentences, considering the nuances of each juvenile’s case, and make new recommendations — but in many cases, that hasn’t happened in earnest.

Unfortunately for kids like Moore, some prosecutors and judges seem not to be invested in that “meaningful opportunity.” To Judge Weill and Hinds County Assistant District Attorney Randy Harris, the fact that Moore never left the car or physically interacted with Temple was irrelevant. “He brought the gun,” Harris told the jury in September. “That is why we are here today. That gun is why Carolyn Temple is dead.”

Though Temple’s death is undoubtedly tragic, the ruling that an impulsive teenager’s bad choice makes him “irreparably corrupt” ignores ample evidence that culpability must be considered differently when the defendant is a child instead of an adult. Adolescent brain science has repeatedly demonstrated the difference between kids and adults — namely, that young brains that are still developing increase “transient rashness, proclivity for risk, and inability to assess consequences,” according to Miller. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have acknowledged this fact, banning life without parole sentences for kids entirely.

Nearly 2,500 prisoners sentenced to life without parole as children are now at the mercy of prosecutors and judges who have been called upon by the highest court to carefully reconsider their cases. Unfortunately for kids like Moore, in counties like Hinds, that careful reconsideration seems to be absent.

Appeals court admonishes district attorney candidate for misconduct

Appeals court admonishes district attorney candidate for misconduct


A candidate for district attorney in Ontario County, New York has been criticized by the state’s appellate court for prosecutorial misconduct.

The Fourth Department Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court admonished the office of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley, saying that it has had to reverse several recent convictions “based upon prosecutorial misconduct.”

The appellate court said the cases of concern involved cases where sexual abuse against children is alleged. All the cases had the same prosecutor.

Former Assistant Prosecutor Kristina “Kitty” Karle confirmed that she is the prosecutor the court referenced. Now a private lawyer, she was the head of the domestic violence and child abuse bureau before being fired by Doorley.

Karle is now running to be the chief elected prosecutor in Ontario County, and did not seem particularly remorseful when asked about the appellate court’s action.

“I hear what they said. I don’t have to agree with it, but I hear what they said,” Karle said to the Democrat & Chronicle. “And if the higher court thinks I said something I shouldn’t, I will take it under consideration moving forward.”

In the case the appellate court reviewed, the sexual abuse conviction of Joe Flowers Jr, a local pastor accused of sexually abusing a preteen boy was upheld. But judges still criticized Karle and said several other recent cases had been overturned.

According to the Democrat & Chronicle, “Court records show that the District Attorney’s Office in fact conceded during the appeal that portions of Karle’s closing argument were improper.”

The court concluded that Karle wrongly attacked the character of the defense lawyer, misstated the evidence of a defense witness, improperly suggested that a juvenile witness opted not to testify out of guilt and suggested to jurors that she was an “unsworn expert.”

More in Explainers

Larry Krasner gets endorsement of Philadelphia black police officers union

Larry Krasner gets endorsement of Philadelphia black police officers union


Since Larry Krasner began his campaign for Philadelphia District Attorney, the consensus has been that he will have to win over the stringent objections of the Philadelphia police.

But now that Krasner has locked up the Democratic nomination, at least a portion of the police force appears willing to welcome him.

Earlier this week the Guardian Civic League, an organization of black Philadelphia police officers, announced that Krasner had won their endorsement.

The fact that over 2,000 Philadelphia black policemen are willing to back him is a big plus for Krasner.

Philadelphia is a strongly Democratic city. Still, there is some thought that if the police come out strongly for Republican nominee Beth Grossman, she might have a shot.

But the decision of the Guardian Civic League is a blow for Grossman and a big win for Krasner. It’s still unclear what the local Fraternal Order of Police, which represents 14,000 active and retired police will do. But the recent meeting between Krasner and union head John McNesby suggest that Krasner could still get their endorsement.

More in Podcasts