Get Informed

Subscribe to our newsletters for regular updates, analysis and context straight to your email.

Close Newsletter Signup

Memorial Day shootings prompt calls for more police—but why?


What you’ll read today

  • Spotlight: Memorial Day shootings prompt calls for more policebut why?

  • ‘I was in constant fear’: Immigrant faces deportation after prison for domestic dispute

  • It’s time to make Chicago police pay for their misdeeds—out of their own budget

  • New Hampshire abolishes the death penalty

  • Bill to prevent police shootings advances in California

  • Florida prosecutor Aramis Ayala, who took a stance against the death penalty, will not seek a second term

In the Spotlight

Memorial Day shootings prompt calls for more police—but why?

Less than a week into her tenure as mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot faced the yearly threat of violence over Memorial Day weekend. Last Thursday, Lightfoot said she would try to prevent violence by “flooding the zone,” adding 1,200 police officers working overtime and on adjusted schedules, 50 officers on buses and trains, and by having police conduct drug raids throughout the city leading up to the weekend. “I want our kids to be safe in every community. That’s what success looks like. I know that we’ve got a way to go on that journey. But, I want to make sure we start the building blocks aggressively this weekend,” Lightfoot said. The Democratic mayor’s language, which emphasizes the importance of aggression and physical force, reveals a continued faith in the power of increased police presence to reduce crime.

Despite these efforts, at least 43 people were shot in the city over the weekend, seven fatally, an increase from last year, when 39 people were shot, seven of them fatally. The new mayor rode with officers over the weekend and responded with them to a shooting on the South Side. She also acknowledged the role of non-law enforcement tactics in preventing shootings: “This is not a law enforcement-only challenge,” Lightfoot said. “It’s a challenge for us in communities to dig down deeper and ask ourselves what we can do to step up to stem the violence.”

In New York City, where murders and shootings are at levels lower than any seen since the 1950s, an isolated spike in shootings among rival gangs in North Brooklyn has prompted police to send additional patrols to certain housing projects. In March, NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill and Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez announced a new push to crack down on gun crimes, which increased gun arrests by 10 percent compared with the same time last year. The NYPD gave the affected precinct eight additional officers in February and will send 17 graduates from the police academy to the command as well. “More than I’ve ever gotten,” said a deputy inspector from the precinct.

But more police does not necessarily mean more safety. Sometimes, it means less. In 2014, sociologist Alex Vitale wrote an article entitled, “We Don’t Just Need Nicer cops. We Need Fewer Cops.” In the wake of high-profile police shootings, people were calling for various police reforms, but Vitale expressed skepticism about many of these. “Everyone likes the idea of a neighborhood police officer who knows and respects the community and can tell who the good guys and the bad guys are,” he wrote, referring to community policing. “Unfortunately, this is a mythic understanding of the history and nature of urban policing. What distinguishes the police from other city agencies is the legal authorization to use force. Their primary tools of problem solving are arrest and coercion. While we need police to follow the law and be restrained in their use of force, we cannot expect them to be significantly more friendly given their current role in society. The reality is that when given the task of enforcing a war on drugs, stamping out quality-of-life violations and engaging in ‘broken windows’ policing, their interactions with the public in high crime and disorder areas is going to be at best gruff and distant and at worst hostile and abusive.”

Likewise with enhanced training, Vitale notes that although improvements in training are needed, “the fact remains that the massive criminalization of communities of color is being carried out using ‘proper procedures.’ The tens of thousands of arrests for low-level drug possession, trespassing, jumping subway turnstiles and dozens of other ‘broken window’ offenses are generally carried out consistent with police policy, if not strict legal standards. Eric Garner may have been killed by improper arrest procedures and use of force, but he was also killed because the police were following orders to arrest people for selling loose cigarettes.”

Instead, Vitale writes, the public needs to push back on the “dramatic expansion” of police power and its role in society. “Any real agenda for police reform must look not to make the police friendlier and more professional. Instead, it must work to reduce the police role and replace it with empowered communities working to solve their own problems. We don’t need community control of the police. We need community control over services that will create safer and more stable neighborhoods and cities.”

Over the past five years, the number of police officers has declined, and the number of police officers per 1,000 residents has been dropping for two decades. The U.S. lost more than 23,000 officers from 2013 to 2016, according to a Justice Department survey. “At the same time, the violent crime rate has also dropped,” write Wendi C. Thomas and The Marshall Project’s Simone Weichselbaum. According to several policing experts, cities are intensely focused on raw numbers, hiring consultants “in a desperate quest to increase their headcount.” Adding more cops to a violent city seems obvious, but the research does not show that it drives down crime rates. James McCabe, a retired NYPD official who now works as a police staffing consultant, says there is little clear connection. “New York City made the conscious decision to reduce the number of cops,” he said. “And crime continued to go down.”

At the end of 2014, as a form of protest, the NYPD began a work slowdown, during which officers were explicitly instructed to perform only their most crucial duties. They were told not to leave their squad cars unless they felt compelled, and were significantly less likely to enforce minor legal violations. Researchers found that civilian complaints of major crimes—murder, rape, felony assault, burglary and grand larceny—did not increase during this time, but instead they actually declined.

Trenton, New Jersey, like Chicago, saw multiple shootings over the holiday weekend, but Governor Phil Murphy, a Democrat, turned to less obvious solutions in addressing the problem. He touted his policy of publicly identifying which states are the sources of guns used in crimes in New Jersey and said that it is time to go even further: “We’ve gone from naming and shaming states that contribute illegal guns. We’ve now begun to name and shame manufacturers.” Trenton’s mayor, Reed Gusciora, said there are other ways to address gun violence. “Trenton can’t continue to be a tale of two cities,” he said, “where you have people who are trying to have economic development and improvements to education, and you have neighborhoods that are racked with gun violence.”

Stories From The Appeal

Aylaliya Birru [Photo Illustration by Elizabeth Brown. Photo by Greystone Adult School/Folsom State Prison]

‘I Was in Constant Fear’: Immigrant Faces Deportation After Prison For Domestic Dispute. Aylaliya Birru has served over four years in a California prison for assaulting her husband, who she said was physically abusive. A pardon from Governor Gavin Newsom is her last hope to stay in the U.S. [Aaron Morrison]

Commentary: It’s Time to Make Chicago Police Pay For Their Misdeeds—Out of Their Own Budget. Chicago hands out millions in settlements and legal fees for police misconduct. Its newly inaugurated mayor should take a dollar from the department’s budget for every dollar the city spends settling with its victims, a criminal justice advocate writes. [Jonathan Ben-Menachem]

Stories From Around the Country

New Hampshire abolishes the death penalty: This morning, lawmakers in New Hampshire voted to abolish the death penalty, overriding a veto from the state’s Republican governor. It is the 21st state to do away with capital punishment. The debate was largely symbolic, because the state last carried out an execution in 1939. It has only one person on death row:  Michael Addison, who was sentenced to death for killing a police officer. This law does not affect his case, but there are no plans to execute him. Capital punishment is on the decline nationwide, and events in New Hampshire were closely watched by supporters and opponents of the death penalty. [Mark Berman / Washington Post]

Bill to prevent police shootings advances in California: After an emotional debate and significant compromises, the California Assembly unanimously approved sweeping legislation that seeks to deter deadly police shootings. Prompted by public outrage over fatal shootings by police officers, the bill would allow police to use deadly force only when it is “necessary” to defend against an imminent threat of death or serious injury to officers or bystanders. The bill is linked with other legislation approved Tuesday by the Senate that would require training for officers on de-escalation, alternatives to shooting, and ways to interact with people with a mental illness or other issues. Robert Weisberg, co-director of the Stanford Criminal Justice Center, said the combined measures will improve police training, but “the inclusion of this word ‘necessary’ doesn’t really change anything, because necessary is … always going to be subject to court interpretation.” Law enforcement opposition forced deletion of an explicit definition of “necessary.” [Don Thompson / Associated Press]

Florida prosecutor Aramis Ayala, who took a stance against the death penalty, will not seek a second term: This week, Aramis Ayala, the state attorney for Orange and Osceola counties, announced that she will not seek a second term. Ayala was elected in 2016 as Florida’s first Black state attorney. She said her decision not to run again was related to the severe blowback she received after opposing the death penalty, including the reassignment of dozens of cases to another state attorney. The Florida Supreme Court upheld that move. “After the Florida Supreme Court’s decision on the death penalty, it became abundantly clear to me that death penalty law in the state of Florida is in direct conflict with my view and my vision for the administration of justice,” she said. Ayala said she was proud to have helped to “raise the standard of prosecutorial accountability” and expand diversity within the agency during her term. Within hours, former Orange-Osceola Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr. suggested he intends to run to replace her. “I don’t think she has a record of touting victims’ rights,” he said. “She’s more focused on defendants’ rights.” [Monivette Cordeiro and Jeff Weiner / Orlando Sentinel]

Thanks for reading. We’ll see you tomorrow.

Have a tip for The Appeal? Write to us at tips@theappeal.org. A good tip is a clear description of newsworthy information that is supported by documented evidence.

Get Informed

Subscribe to our newsletters for regular updates, analysis and context straight to your email.